To let the mind of Christ be our mind means to be like Jesus, to live a Christ-like life, self-emptying and humbling, transforming and centring our heart, soul, mind and strength in God.
The Liturgy of the Passion includes a portion of Paul’s letter to the church at Philippi which helps our understanding of the events between the triumph of the palms and the tragedy of the crucifixion. This letter is one of the seven letters of Paul, which scholars agree were actually written by Paul. The letter to the Philippians is of special interest for various reasons: it’s known as Paul’s “farewell letter” because Paul wrote it from prison in Ephesus around 62CE, and he imagined it would be his last letter, for he knew the imperial charge against him could end in his execution. Furthermore, the church in Philippi is reputed to be the first Christian community Paul established in Europe, around the year 50CE, hence, the first Christian church in Europe. (Philippi no longer exists, having been destroyed by earthquake in the 6th century and after a series of foreign invaders, disappearing completely in the 14th.) But what is most remarkable about this letter is the deep affection Paul holds for the people in this community and they in turn feel toward him. Paul was an independent fellow, earning his own living as a tentmaker, refusing most offers of support from the churches, with the exception of the church at Philippi; Epaphroditus, their messenger, travelled to meet Paul in prison and bring him contributions from the community and this messenger no doubt carried the letter we now read back to the people in Philippi. In other letters by Paul to the churches, he addresses problems which have arisen since his departure; in the letter to the church at Philippi, he addresses no problems or issues. Instead, he sets out for them the characteristics of “life in Christ,” one of his favourite phrases.
Phillipians 2:1-13 is notable for the inclusion of a hymn, the earliest known Christian hymn, which may have been originally written by Paul but more likely pre-dates even Paul; however, it must have been sung often in the early church for Paul to include it, indeed, incorporate it into the fabric of his thoughts. The hymn emphasizes the twin pillars of Paul’s theology: “Christ crucified” and “Jesus is Lord.” Chapter 2 begins with guidance about behaviour for those who are “in Christ”:
2:1 If then there is any encouragement in Christ, any consolation from love, any sharing in the Spirit, any compassion and sympathy,
2:2 make my joy complete: be of the same mind, having the same love, being in full accord and of one mind.
2:3 Do nothing from selfish ambition or conceit, but in humility regard others as better than yourselves.
2:4 Let each of you look not to your own interests, but to the interests of others.
The text continues by grounding the mind they are to have in what they see in Jesus: “Let the same mind be in you that was in Christ Jesus” (2:5). And what kind of mind was that? Paul now quotes the hymn to explain. The hymn has three parts and presents a summary of the story of Jesus; it expresses Paul’s central convictions about Jesus (verses 6-11).
The second and third parts emphasize “Christ crucified” and “Jesus Christ is Lord.” In part two when Paul refers to Jesus becoming “obedient to the point of death,” he specifically adds, “even death on a cross.” For Paul, Jesus didn’t just die—he was crucified, executed, by the imperial power of his day, because Jesus advocated a vision of life quite different from what Rome considered normal and acceptable. Part three is perhaps the most triumphant proclamation of “Jesus Christ is Lord” in the NT. Immediately following the reference to Jesus dying on a cross, the hymn proclaims, “Therefore God also highly exalted him and gave him the name that is above every name.” Then the text refers to the three- storied universe of the ancient imagination: “so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bend, in heaven and earth and under the earth.” It concludes with language that explicitly countered Roman imperial theology: “and every tongue . . . confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God.” Jesus is Lord—the emperor is not. Jesus is Lord—the rulers of this world are not. Treasonous language in the Roman imperial world, and in many countries of the world today, perhaps even our own.
If we look closely at part one, we notice it is filled with contrasts. What we see in Jesus is very different from what we see in someone else, but what was the contrast? Who was it that regarded “equality with God as something to be exploited,” or as “something to be grasped at.” And what was the “emptying” of Jesus all about? Scholars suggest three ways of understanding this passage which complement each other. One contrast is with Adam. According to the creation story in Genesis, Adam and Eve were tempted by the desire “to be like God.” Adam, mankind, desires to be godlike; Jesus in contrast did not seek equality with God. Adam and Eve made themselves the centre of the universe, whereas Jesus emptied himself.
The second contrast in these lines suggests the preexistent Christ, or, to use the language of the opening of John’s gospel, the “Word” that was with God from the beginning and that became incarnate in Jesus. In this understanding, the Word emptied itself of its divine qualities in order to become human
in Jesus. Becoming human meant becoming vulnerable, even to the point of being executed by the powers that rule the world. The Christ, who was with God from the beginning, emptied himself in order to walk among us.
The third possible contrast is an obvious one. Who in Paul’s world claimed to be “in the form of God” and who saw “equality with God as something to be exploited”? The Roman emperor who was proclaimed by imperial theology as divine, who was given the titles, Lord, Son of God and indeed Saviour of the world because he brought peace on earth.
All three interpretations mean the same thing: God, self-emptied and incarnate in Jesus, was passionate not about power and control, but about justice and peace, right(eous)ness, and peace through nonviolence, in contrast to the Pax Romana imposed through violence. What we see in Jesus—Christ crucified and raised as “Jesus Christ the Lord”—is the way, the path, which we are to follow. This, Paul says in his text, is the mind that the followers of Jesus are to have. What we see in Jesus is the way, the path of personal transformation. The book of Acts calls the early Christians “Followers of the Way.” Paul advocates a way of life very different from, indeed, in opposition to, the wisdom of this world.
This letter of Paul to the Philippians takes us back to the very beginnings of the Christian movement. Paul’s conversion happened about 5 years after Jesus’ death in 30CE. For the next 25 years Paul travelled throughout the eastern Roman Empire. He writes his letters in the 50s, this one to the Philippians in the early 60s—that’s only 30 years after the crucifixion. This hymn takes us back to the earliest Christian thinking about Jesus, the roots of our Christian heritage. What does it mean to us 21 centuries later?
If we declare Jesus is Lord today, no one in authority challenges that claim; our authority figures declare the same thing. The Royal family, the Governor General, our political leaders—they all attend church as we do and declare Jesus as Lord. But to follow the way of Jesus is to voice the way of peace and justice, to urge our governors and our social conscience to care for the poor, to speak for the marginalized and downtrodden, to point out injustice wherever it exists. If we truly did that, individually and collectively, we would not be very popular, for the values of “the Way” contrast with, indeed are often in opposition to, the values of the society in which we live. It takes much courage to speak out against the normal, accepted values of those around us, to speak for equality and fairness, to speak for the marginalized, the homeless and the refugee. Often the characteristics of Christ’s kingdom are at odds with the prevailing values of our society, exactly the contrast between the procession of the palms and the cross of Calvary. To follow Jesus as Lord, to have the mind of Christ, as St. Paul wants us to, means to be as passionate about peace and justice, as self-emptying and vulnerable, as Jesus was and is. The late Bishop John Spong comments on Paul’s letter to the Philippians in this way:
“The people in the Philippi church had tensions in their lives over how to worship, what to believe and how to act . . . Paul urges them to let the mind of Christ be their mind. Then he explained that Christ did not grasp after a superior status but emptied himself. It was in the fullness of his humanity that he found the freedom to give his life to others and that was how God was seen in him.”
To let the mind of Christ be our mind means to be like Jesus, to live a Christ-like life, self-emptying and humbling, transforming and centring our heart, soul, mind and strength in God.