Reflection from Rev. David Browning November 20, 2022

Matthew 3: 1-12

When a Bible story has a lot of detail, the writer is saying: these events really happened, just as they are described. The John the Baptist story, therefore, has much to say to every reader, then and now.

The story of John the Baptist makes clear: God can and does invite everyone into God’s presence and ministries. I think the author of Matthew’s point is: if God can invite and enable such an odd duck as John to practice such an amazing ministry, there is hope for us, too.

John the Baptist began his adult life as a social misfit. His manner of dress; living alone in the desert; manner of speech – which was rather accusatory; all these characteristics describe John as an odd character. His clothing, diet and lifestyle made him more than an object of curiosity – or rejection – by people. His life choices and manner of speaking got people’s attention and derision.

Rather than invite and encourage people to hear his good news about the Messiah, John’s message was confrontational and judgemental. We can only imagine how people who heard him would react! Moreover, the way he addressed the Pharisees and Sadducees – men, who had dedicated their lives to following and serving God – was indefensible. “You brood of vipers” was an inexcusable way to speak to anyone!

John the Baptist’s point in addressing everyone who heard him was: just because we share a common ancestor (Abraham), and all of the pious claims its religious leaders have taught ever since, does not make us any different from anyone else in God’s love. All people are loved, equally, by God. Everyone is judged by God the same way. In other words, no one is better than anyone else just because of ancestral and religious claims.

For all of John’s oddness etc., he did invite people to be baptized by him. Baptism, then, was of repentance – or, turning toward God. All of us sin; it’s part of our nature. We will never stop sinning – again, because it is our nature. But as we turn to God – as a sunflower turns to the sun – we receive God’s love and forgiveness for the mistakes we have made. In Baptism, we deliberately choose to accept God’s promise, that the Holy Spirit will guide and bless us always.

We learn from John’s message, and modern teachings, that baptism is an outward and visible sign of an inward and spiritual grace. It is not a special badge that makes us better than other people. As we learn in subsequent Gospel stories and Acts, people were blessed by the Holy Spirit just as the baptized were/are. What God does is all about God – not us. Our turning (repentance) to God is our deliberate way of asking the Holy Spirit to come into our lives.

So what?

The story of John the Baptist makes clear: God can and does invite everyone into God’s presence and ministries. I think the author of Matthew’s point is: if God can invite and enable such an odd duck as John to practice such an amazing ministry, there is hope for us, too. If John’s verbal attacks on religious leaders brought positive changes in people’s lives, what can Good News, patience and love do?

So, the story of John the Baptist is not just an eyebrow-raising tale about an odd character. It is a proclamation of Good News for everyone.
D. Browning

Readings And Collect For November 13

Collect – Prayers for an Inclusive Church (2009) alt.

God of all people,
from every tribe and language; you called true witnesses
who sang your praise, lived your grace and worked for peace.
May we share their faith and live by their example,
so that we might be a blessing to the hunger of your world;
through Jesus Christ, whose body we are. Amen.

Readings

Wisdom 3:1-9
Psalm 116:1-8
1 Peter 3:1-9
John 6:37-40

Reflection For November 13 by Rev. Wayne Fraser

Mary the Tower

Gospel reading: John 11: 1-7, 17-27

I have used my prerogative as priestly presider to choose a different gospel reading than the one appointed for today by the revised common lectionary. John 11, the story of the raising of Lazarus, is appointed for Lent 5 in year A, but I simply can’t wait until next March, Lent 5, to share the exciting research that has been done on this passage. Diana Butler Bass, noted church historian, has summarized in a recent sermon the biblical research of her friend, Elizabeth Schrader, and it will blow your mind, for it changes so much of our understanding of Jesus, Mary, the gospel writers, church history—everything changes as a result of this biblical research. Butler- Bass’s sermon lasted 40 minutes, but I’ve got only 13 this morning. Here goes:

…sometime in the fourth century, someone had altered the oldest text of the Gospel of John and split the character Mary into two. Mary became Mary and Martha. She went through the whole manuscript of John 11 and John 12, and lo and behold, that editor had gone in [and] at every single place and . . . moment that you read Martha in English, it originally said, ‘Mary.’ The editor changed it all… Every pronoun is changed. Every singular “sister” is changed to the plural “sisters”. So that the story becomes a charming story about Lazarus and the resurrection and his two lovely sisters, Mary and Martha.

Elizabeth (Libbie) Schrader is currently a PhD student in New Testament Studies at Duke University, but when she was a Masters student at General Theological Seminary in New York City, she examined the oldest known version of John’s gospel, called Papyrus 66, created around the year 200, and she discovered something that no one else had ever noticed. She found that the text of John 11 and 12 had been edited, altered, changed utterly. To put it simply, in the original Greek version of John 11 and 12, there is no character named Martha. Martha has been added, inserted into the story.

Our text of John 11 begins “Now a certain man was ill, Lazarus of Bethany, the village of Mary and her sister, Martha.” We all assume we know this family, right? We read about them this past summer in Luke 10 when busy Martha complains to Jesus that Mary isn’t helping serve the guests. Well, our assumption may well be wrong. The original Greek text of the oldest known version of the gospel of John actually says, “Now a certain man was ill, Lazarus of Bethany, at the village of Mary and his sister, Mary.” In the original text of John 11, this Lazarus has only one sister, and her name is Mary. We have two stories about two different families.

Someone edited John 11 in Papyrus 66 and removed one reference to Mary and created a Martha, actually changed the spelling of Maria to spell Martha. I studied enough Greek to know that it would be pretty easy to make the Greek iota into a theta, the “i” into a “th.” And where the original text refers to “his sister, Mary,” the scribe altered it to read “her sister, Martha.” Butler- Bass summarizes the moment this way: “Schrader sat in the library with all of this, and it came thundering at her, the realization that sometime in the fourth century, someone had altered the oldest text of the Gospel of John and split the character Mary into two. Mary became Mary and Martha. She went through the whole manuscript of John 11 and John 12, and lo and behold, that editor had gone in [and] at every single place and . . . moment that you read Martha in English, it originally said, ‘Mary.’ The editor changed it all… Every pronoun is changed. Every singular “sister” is changed to the plural “sisters”. So that the story becomes a charming story about Lazarus and the resurrection and his two lovely sisters, Mary and Martha.”

But John 11 is not about them at all, it’s about a different Lazarus and his sister Mary. Lazarus is never actually mentioned in Luke 10; Martha welcomes Jesus “to her home.” Martha and Mary of Luke 10 live “in a certain village”; the two siblings of John 11 live in Bethany—“Lazarus of Bethany, the village of Mary.” There’s something about Mary. Who is this Mary? She is familiar enough to the early disciples or the gospel writer that they can refer to “the village of Mary,” not the village of Lazarus, but of Mary. It has long been speculated that this Mary is Mary Magdalene; in John 12 a woman named Mary anoints the feet of Jesus with rich perfume and dries his feet with her hair. We have long assumed that Mary was Mary Magdalene. Well, could very well be, and the one woman in John 11 & 12, the sister of Lazarus, indeed could be Mary Magdalene. Why was her identity altered by introducing “her sister Martha” into the narrative, obscuring the passage with an allusion to Luke 10?

The answer is suggested by the final verse of the portion of the gospel passage we heard this morning, verse 27: “Yes, Lord,” she replied, “I believe that you are the Messiah, the Son of God, who is to come into the world.” Our English versions say that Martha said this; the original Greek text says it was Mary. Why is that change important? First, it is the only Christological confession in the gospel of John, a very significant assertion of Jesus as Messiah, as ‘Son of God.’ Secondly, who says something similar in the other gospels? Right! In all other three gospels, “Peter and Jesus have a conversation. And Jesus turns to Peter and says, “Who am I?” And Peter actually says, “You are the Messiah, the son of the living God.” And Jesus turns around and says to him words that are familiar to all of us, “You are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church.” That’s St. Peter, first bishop of Rome, the first Pope, from whom we get St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome and the Roman Catholic Church. Pretty important guy! And in Roman Catholicism, only men can be Pope, or Bishops, or priests, because Jesus chose only male disciples. Or did he? In our version of John’s gospel the great confession is from the mouth of a minor character, Martha, about whom we hear nothing more. But she wasn’t there in the original John 11. Mary Magdalene was. Mary Magdalene, present at the crucifixion and burial of Jesus, the first witness to the empty tomb and the resurrection, the one who informed Peter and the others, “I have seen the Lord.”

Oh, you’re going to say, it’s not that Mary, she was from the town of Magdala, this Mary is from Bethany. Well, the Mary was from Bethany, because in Jesus’ time, there was no town called Magdala. In Hebrew, the word means ‘Tower.’ The term Magdalene is a title. Mary the Tower—the tower of strength, the tower of faith. Mary the Tower vs Peter the Rock. Rock, paper, scissors. Rock always wins. Or does it? Paper beats rock. This research of a piece of Papyrus leads to speculation about the power struggle happening in the early church and later, about the place of women in leadership roles. The Peter faction vs the Mary faction. Mary Magdalene was there at crucial moments of Jesus’ life and ministry. She was in the garden, at the cross, at the tomb. She’s called the Apostle to the Apostles. So, in whose interest is it that she be removed from John 11 with its powerful Christological confession and be replaced by a relative unknown woman named Martha? Mary was downgraded here. Why?

I leave you to speculate further, but I venture to share that if Mary the Tower had been acknowledged and celebrated equally as much as Peter the Rock, the institution of the church and its history would have been vastly different and our understanding of Christ’s message and ministry would be highly enriched by feminine wisdom and spirituality. Can you imagine? The mind boggles with possibilities. An all-male clergy? A patriarchal institution? Elaine Craig’s comment in the Globe Aug. 10 can easily be applied to the church: “We know that having women involved at the highest levels of organizations can help change leadership and result in better decision-making. Yet the [church’s] governance remains overwhelmingly male-dominated.” There were nearly 100 female bishops at Lambeth this year; twenty years ago there were less than 10. The times they are a changin’. There is much to contemplate, much to study further. We have not heard the last of this research and it will stimulate much discussion which I pray is respectful and fruitful. The Holy Spirit is let loose upon the world. Hear what her Spirit is saying to God’s people.

Thank You

Thankyou

Thanks to all who participated in our MAP program. The results of the fourth session are attached. These are the initiatives we voted for. Thanks to all who attended the lunch and a special thanks to those who helped with set-up and take-down of the lunch.

We are pleased to let you know that our submission has been accepted and approved by the Diocese. Now we have to do it!

If you see anything on the list that you would like to help with, please reach out to Barbara S., Beth K. or Sheila.
Blessings,
Beth and Barbara

Reflection For November 6 by the Reverend Deacon Sandra Thomson

If, when you read the Gospel from Luke 6 you noticed that it was familiar but also a bit different than you remembered, you might have been thinking about the reading from Matthew 5. As we know the Gospels are written by different people, but some of the content has been taken from another. There are differences like I said, between Matthew and Luke’s version of these stories. So could they be two separate stories that Jesus told or are they the same story, with an emphasis on different parts in order to get the author’s message across?

The crisis with the homeless is not getting any better and with the future of higher interest rates, it could get worse. Many people look away or move to another side of the street when we see someone who is dirty or socially different. It is human to be afraid sometimes, but what we need to realize is that they are in need of help.

Both are the Beatitudes. According to Bible Study Tools, the words from Matthew, the Sermon on the Mount, outline Jesus’ idea of a fulfilled spiritual life in Christ, whereas the Beatitudes of the Sermon on the Plain (Luke’s passage) deal with how to respect economic and social differences. Another difference is the number of Beatitudes; 5 from Luke and 9 from Matthew.

Matthew’s sermon was focused on a Jewish group, outlining how to be obedient to God, whereas Luke’s version was for Gentiles who may not be used to the Jewish laws.

So, either way you look at them, Jesus was teaching the listeners in his time and us today, how to live a Godly life. Some of the stories in the Bible are not as easy to translate to our time here in our time, but this one is much easier.

Since the Sermon on the plain is dealing with how to respect economic and social differences, this reading once again, is directly related to my ministry with the less fortunate in the city of St. Catharines. Before taking on the ministry of working with the needy, I really never noticed how many topics from the Bible can relate to what I do. The first thing that I was reminded of, was how some of the clients of the breakfast program help each other out. I realize that there are some who are selling cigarettes and drugs to others, but I have also seen a true community of sharing and true caring for each other.

Occasionally, during Covid, when the numbers of people at the door looking for something to eat became higher, we would run out of something. Could be milk cartons, oatmeal or sandwiches. When I had to tell a person that we had run out, I would sometimes hear someone say, “you can have my milk”, or “I have enough so you can have my oatmeal”. Some of the people who offered part of their breakfast had just mentioned that they were hungry; that they had not eaten since the morning before.

A more recent incident happened a week or two ago. It was a cold morning and I was approached by a gentleman who was looking for a jacket, sweater or maybe a blanket. We don’t usually have those items, since we don’t really have the room for clothing and are trying to stick to what we do best and that is serving breakfast. We keep socks, hats and mitts but the bigger items we leave to other places. I did check in the closet to be sure nothing had been put in there that this man could have. There was nothing in there so I had to tell him no. A few minutes later I saw him speaking to a woman who was also getting herself some breakfast. I then saw her remove her vest that she was wearing, take off the warm, zip up the front sweatshirt, and hand this over to him. She then proceeded to put her vest back on and went to her table to eat. I know this woman and approached her to make sure she did not feel obligated to give him a piece of her clothing. She responded, “no, I was warm enough and have another sweatshirt at home and he needed it more than I did”

I must say that I was quite shocked to see this and hear her words. She has very little but yet still gave what she had away. I don’t know how many sweatshirts she has but I am pretty sure I have more in my closet. I am not sure that I would have done what she did, yet I have more. (I wasn’t wearing nor had with me any extra clothing, but I still question if I would have given him it). This woman knows what it is like to need something, whereas I have really not ‘needed’ anything in my life that I couldn’t go out and get.

The crisis with the homeless is not getting any better and with the future of higher interest rates, it could get worse. Many people look away or move to another side of the street when we see someone who is dirty or socially different. It is human to be afraid sometimes, but what we need to realize is that they are in need of help. We, at the Church of the Transfiguration do our part. I see people come in on Sunday morning with a box of cereal, a jar of peanut butter or jam, or cheese whiz. Quite often, by the end of service on some Sundays I need to make more than one trip to my car with what is in the baskets in the front entrance. One box or jar from a few people, becomes a trunk load that serves many.

We are the rich in the story from Luke. We have a lot to be thankful for. Do you respect the economic and social differences in this world?
What are you doing to live a ‘Jesus shaped life’?

Readings And Collect For October 30

Collect

O God,
the strength of those who humbly confess their sin
and place their hope in you,
save us from vain displays of righteousness,
and give us grace to keep faith
with the true humility of our Lord Jesus Christ. Amen.

Readings

Habakkuk 1:1-4; 2:1-4

Psalm 119:137-144

2 Thessalonians 1:1-4, 11-12

John 11: 1-7, 17-27

Reflection For October 30 From Rev. David Browning

Luke 6:20-31

Luke was a physician, recruited by a local governor to ‘get the facts’ about Jesus’ life, teachings, and events. Learning about Jesus, with no hype, is helpful for everyone – then and now. But, these verses emphasize the difference Jesus makes for his followers.

Verses 20-26 lay out four timeless, life contrasts: poor/rich, hungry/full, weeping/laughing, rejected/accepted. Jesus’ message is: when we suffer from very real hurts, we may expect Jesus to be with us, caring for, leading and delivering us. These four contrasts, were common in Luke’s day, and still are, today. The point emphasizes what life is and can be, and the difference Jesus makes.

Part of Jesus’ love for us includes making us free to choose how we will live. This same love informs us of consequences. So, may we choose Jesus in all ways and in all things. Then, we will experience life as it can be – in joy and through sorrows.

Luke also records consequences for certain choices people make. If we do not do as Jesus teaches, there are woes. Rejecting Jesus separates us from God. Luke reminds us that Jesus is the source of life-as-it-can-be. Therefore, the choices we make will bring us blessings or woes.

Verses 26-31 continue Luke’s contrasts between what is good in life, and what hurts us. But, in these verses, he goes one step further. To be Jesus’ disciple (‘learner, follower’) means that we must follow the values and behaviours He expects of us. These include: loving our enemies who hate us; doing good to those who hate us; praying for those who abuse us; giving to everyone without restrictions (what we give and to whom).

Luke then summarizes Jesus’ point: Do unto others as we would want them to do for and to us. So what Luke says applies to everyone. We all have the ability to make life choices. Experiencing life as it can be with Jesus is grounded in what we choose and do. Rejecting Jesus and his values brings us woes and God’s disfavor.

Following Jesus does not mean that we will not suffer. For example, the loss of a loved one – especially a child – brings indescribable pain. Also, many of Jesus’ followers, then and now, suffer from poverty, hunger, wars, and natural calamities (flood, hurricane, drought etc). But, the difference between following Jesus, and choosing to go it alone, is the unlimited love, help and healing that only Jesus can and does give.

Yes, there are people, who go it alone and prosper. But, Jesus warns them and us. It’s only a matter of time before those who ‘have’ will soon ‘have not.’ There are consequences for our life choices.

Part of Jesus’ love for us includes making us free to choose how we will live. This same love informs us of consequences. So, may we choose Jesus in all ways and in all things. Then, we will experience life as it can be – in joy and through sorrows.
David Browning

Message from our Prayer Group Team

PrayingHands

We always have our community needs in our prayers but the current Transfiguration Prayer List has become very long and we are not always aware of when prayers are no longer requested by those on the list.

We have decided to restructure, therefore we are asking the congregation to submit prayers through writing the request on the paper provided in the Narthex of the church and putting them in the butterfly box or emailing me at guidinggranny@hotmail.com.

Every 1-3 or 6 months (depending on the requested time) we will be clearing out the requests.
Blessings Jane

Revive

ReviveLogo

We are offering another session of the Revive program. The Revive program answers the question: How do we go from doing ministry for the church to being in a relationship with this life-giving empowering God? We quite simply have to stop. Stop the frantic busyness. Stop the intellectual analysis. Stop the self-reliance. Stop the anxious worrying, and let God renew and revive our hearts and minds. Being in a relationship with God, as with every other healthy relationship we experience, takes time and attention in order for it to grow and deepen. Otherwise, as with other relationships, our connection with God can shrivel and even die if it is left to languish. Revive aims to provide a supportive structure and community to help that relationship reignite and come alive!

Come and enliven your spirit, your connection to God, yourself and others! Please contact Rev. Sheila for more information.

Reflection For October 23

Actions vs. Attitude

In this week’s Gospel reading, Jesus tells a parable to teach us the importance of praying with the right attitude. The two men in the parable are a Pharisee and a tax collector.

We know that God loves us and is proud of us. But if we think for even one moment that we are flawless -or worse- worthy of God’s praise, then the only person we are fooling is ourselves.

In this time, Tax collectors were Jews who worked for the Romans. They were viewed as traitors by their own people, foreigners by the Romans, and resented by everyone. They weren’t paid a real wage, but rather, were expected to take more than required and then “skim off the top.” Unsurprisingly, this system made it easy to be dishonest and take advantage.

Upon entering the temple, the tax collector bowed his head, hitting himself to show repentance. He knew he was a sinner. He knew he needed God’s forgiveness. And he knew that no one can be proud of themselves before God. However, the Pharisee stood up to pray and merely informed God of all the wrong things which he had not done. He concluded by boasting about the religious practices he had observed. The Pharisee thought he was praying, when really he was praising only himself. Jesus tells us that it is the first man who went home justified before God.

This parable leaves me questioning my own intentions sometimes. Am I, as a Christian, acting like Jesus for the right reasons? Or am I doing what God calls me to do, simply to make myself look (and feel) more righteous? Am I brave enough -and Christian enough- to admit my mistakes and
shortcomings?

We know that God loves us and is proud of us. But if we think for even one moment that we are flawless -or worse- worthy of God’s praise, then the only person we are fooling is ourselves. Conversely, if we acknowledge our sin and humbly repent before God, Jesus says that God will exalt us. The lower we make ourselves on Earth, the higher God will exalt us in Heaven!

So, instead of pointing the magnifying glass at what others are doing this week, may we all have the humility and grace to analyse our own actions and intentions, with God’s help. Amen!